Maybe he has something against adult entertainment. Maybe he was turned down for the leading male role in a porn movie. Maybe it is all just a scheme to appeal to more stodgy voters by going against the producers of adult videos.
Looks to me like just another attempt by one of our illustrious politicians to "blow" our minds with his great idea of taxing one of our most popular sins... sex. I mean come on, where does he figure that he will be coming out ahead by bringing a tax on the sale and production of porn movies?
Is he kidding? There is no way the republicans would vote for anything like this for TWO reasons: One - none of them want to be associated with voting on anything related to porn and Two - they would have to pay more money for their work session entertainment!
Not to mention that the Governor of California might have many sleepless nights worrying about whether any early films he might have stared in to jump start his career might be released to the general porn viewing public!
News: Capitol Weekly: The Newspaper of California State Government and Politics
